State of San Andreas vs. Joker Arazolla
Case #2025-10-05-001
← Back to Dockets
Published: 2025-10-05
Case #2025-10-05-001
Defendant: Joker Arazolla
Opened: 2025-10-05
Filed by: Blaine County Sheriffs Office
Presiding Judge: Hon. James Henderson
Prosecution Counsel:
Jason Butcher
Defense Counsel:
Jane Eyre
GUILTY
Charges
| Code | Offense | Plea | Verdict | Custody | Fine |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attempted Theft of a Government Vehicle | Not Guilty | 30 | $5,000 |
Exhibits
No exhibits attached.
Official Docket
The question before the court is intent.
While the defendant asserts there was no intent to steal, his deliberate actions — entering a government vehicle, manipulating controls, and operating it within a secure area — constitute a substantial step toward theft under San Andreas law.
The vehicle’s remote start and inability to leave the facility may have prevented completion of the offense, but the attempt itself remains evident.
The defense’s claim regarding the seatbelt is irrelevant to the criminal element of the charge; the law does not provide mitigation for “safety awareness” while committing an unlawful act.
Based on the testimony and evidence presented, the court finds that the defendant did engage in conduct consistent with an Attempted Theft of a Government Vehicle.
Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that the defendant, Joker Arazolla, is found GUILTY of Attempted Theft of a Government Vehicle.
In consideration of the circumstances, including the defendant’s cooperation, criminal history, and the fact that the vehicle was recovered without damage, the court will impose a fine only and waive any custodial sentence.
While the defendant asserts there was no intent to steal, his deliberate actions — entering a government vehicle, manipulating controls, and operating it within a secure area — constitute a substantial step toward theft under San Andreas law.
The vehicle’s remote start and inability to leave the facility may have prevented completion of the offense, but the attempt itself remains evident.
The defense’s claim regarding the seatbelt is irrelevant to the criminal element of the charge; the law does not provide mitigation for “safety awareness” while committing an unlawful act.
Based on the testimony and evidence presented, the court finds that the defendant did engage in conduct consistent with an Attempted Theft of a Government Vehicle.
Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that the defendant, Joker Arazolla, is found GUILTY of Attempted Theft of a Government Vehicle.
In consideration of the circumstances, including the defendant’s cooperation, criminal history, and the fact that the vehicle was recovered without damage, the court will impose a fine only and waive any custodial sentence.